My observation is that there are many, many religions, and that many, if not most, people regard the religion that they are a member of as being the best. Therefore, it seems to me, everyone agrees that religions can vary with regard to how optimal they are, and that there is the possibility that there are non-optimal aspects in any given religion.
If we were to ask whether religion X is the best religion, it seems to me that the probability of that being so would be 1/N, N being the total number of religions. Thus, it would seem to me that we could make the assumption that any specific religion was not optimal, and a good generalization would therefore be that all religions can probably improve.
But what would constitute improvement? As a Humanian, I would use the REUEP to evaluate them. I would ask of a religion whether it fostered joy, contentment, and appreciation (JCA) and reduced pain, suffering, disability, and/or early death (PSDED), and whether there were indeed parts of the religion that actually fostered PSDED.
I know that many are convinced that religions produce much PSDED, and some of those convinced of that would have us get rid of religion. But they overlook, I believe, the enormous JCA that those religions provide, and I, for one, have difficulty throwing away things that have good in them. To me, getting rid of the bad parts and keeping the good parts seems the right way, rather than throwing away the good with the bad.
Bill Van Fleet
Humanian
Throwing away the Good with the Bad
Are all religions equally good? Beyond improvement? What constitutes improvement of a religion? Should religions advocate improvement of themselves? Should they share/communicate with each other?
Return to “IMPROVEMENT OF RELIGION”
Jump to
- DISCUSSIONS OF BELIEFS IN THE HUMANIAN BELIEF MANUAL
- ↳ Humanian General Ethical Principles and Their Existential Foundations
- ↳ Care of the Self
- ↳ Relationships with Significant Others
- ↳ Participation in Human Societies
- ↳ Relationships to Other Species
- ↳ Care of the Planet
- GENERAL DISCUSSIONS (Not Related to Specific Beliefs in the Belief Manual)
- ↳ HUMANIANITY FORUM MANAGEMENT
- ↳ PHILOSOPHICO-RELIGIOUS ISSUES
- ↳ CULTURAL VICTIMIZATION
- ↳ JUSTICE
- ↳ SPIRITUALITY
- ↳ GOODNESS, THE
- ↳ SCIENCE AND RELIGION
- ↳ THE UNBORN, UNCONCEIVED, YET-TO-BE-CONCEIVED, AND NON-HUMAN
- ↳ IMPROVEMENT OF RELIGION
- ↳ OUR GODS
- ↳ IDEAL GOVERNMENT
- ↳ FAITH AND DOUBT
- ↳ THE MIND-BODY PROBLEM
- ↳ ANNOYANCE, IRRITATION, ANGER, OUTRAGE, HOSTILITY, REVENGE, PUNISHMENT, VIOLENCE, TERRORISM, WAR
- ↳ FREE WILL VS. DETERMINISM
- ↳ CREATING HUMANS
- ↳ RELEVANT FUNDAMENTAL FACTS
- ↳ REUEP (now HUEP) AND FUNDAMENTAL HUMANIAN VALUES
- ↳ LEXICON, LANGUAGE, AND LYRICS
- ↳ VARIETIES OF HUMANIANITY
- ↳ HUMANIANITY RESOURCES
- ↳ EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
- ↳ HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATIONS
- ↳ HUMANIANITY ORGANIZATIONS (Humanianity of _____)
- ↳ PERSONAL ETHICAL ISSUES